A Very Old Obituary

Maybe someday everything will be available online.  Here’s something I hadn’t expected: the college newspaper I did some writing for has made its archives available on the Internet.  I can’t bring myself to read most of what I wrote way back then.  But there was one piece I was curious about — an obituary for Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston when I was growing up (I was named for him, incidentally).  It holds up pretty well, I think, although the balance doesn’t quite work in one spot, and there’s a which in there that I’d definitely turn into a that.

FOR SOMEONE who grew up a Catholic in Boston, Cushing was not a name, not even an institution, he was a part of life itself: he was always there, at Confirmations and graduations and dedications of the countless schools and churches he helped build. His picture was in everyone’s hallway, a fullcolor portrait cut out of the Globe when he was made a Cardinal. You took pride in his voice and his Red Sox cap and his friendship with your President because in him you had someone only Boston could produce: that blend of worldliness and sanctity, that despiser of stuffiness and lover of ritual.

Times change-the schools start closing, the churches aren’t quite as filled anymore; a younger man with a strange unIrish name takes over. And finally, Cushing himself is gone, less than a month after the ceremony which concluded his life’s work. It’s fitting; you know it could hardly have been otherwise. But still the memories linger, of the rasping twang, of the swishing of his red silk robes, of a life that was part of Boston’s life.

Cushing is part of the past now, but he can’t rest there-by the nature of things he must become the stuff of legend and anecdote. You are supposed to remember that there was a pool for how long he would speak at Confirmation, with the winning number being around an hour. And you will recall the stories and tell the jokes even if they seem to miss what he meant to you, because Cushing was from Boston, and that is how Boston remembers a man, that is how Boston honors a saint.

Here’s the link.

Summit Available on Amazon and B&N!

The Kindle edition is available here.

The Nook edition is available here.

I’ll get it onto other sites sooner or later.

I’m charging $2.99, which I figure is somewhere between “It’s so cheap there must be something wrong with it” and “It’s so expensive it can’t be worth it”.

Don’t be tempted to buy the used paperbacks also on offer.  They won’t give you the same quiet sense of satisfaction you’ll get knowing that some of your money is going to the author in return for his hard work in perpetrating the novel.

Next up, Pontiff!

The Worst Movie Ever Made

I Don’t Know How She Does It.

I’m not talking about the stuff on Mystery Science Theater.  This is a movie with A-list actors (well B+-list actors) directed by a guy who made a movie I liked (Emma).

“4.3!” — IMDB

“Insipid, unfunny, and cliché-ridden!” — Washington Post

“Witless!” — San Francisco Chronicle

We watched about twenty minutes of it, and we felt as though our brains were turning to oatmeal.

Here’s the official trailer.  I dare you to watch the whole thing:

Publishing an e-book

Well, it just doesn’t seem to be that hard.  Surprisingly, the hard part seems to have been writing the book in the first place. Here is the cover:

Summit

Actually, the cover was kinda hard, too.  And okay, I had help.

Amazon and Barnes & Noble are currently pondering whether I’ve made any mistakes.  If I haven’t, the thing should show up in their catalogs in a day or two.

How much would you pay for an e-book?

I’ve got to figure out my pricing before very long.

Seems to me that publishers’ prices for e-books are stupidly high.  Presumably they don’t want to set them so low that they cannibalize their hardcopy sales (and annoy their retailers).  But that’s not a problem I have.

One theory I’ve heard is that buying an e-book is an impulse purchase, and you want to set your price low enough to encourage that sort of irresponsible behavior.  What price would make you act irresponsibly?

(Of course, a price of $0.00 is not unheard of.  That may increase my readership, but it won’t make me wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice.)

Are e-books damaging society?

Jonathan Franzen seems to think so.

Andrew Sullivan’s readers ponder the issue.  Some of their points are relevant to my post Is the Internet Forever? One of them says:

I don’t know that I buy Jonanthan Franzen’s argument that the future of democracy depends on the survival of the physical book and I understand the great utility of ebooks. However, there is a great deal to be said for keeping the printed page alive.  If its language is English, I can pick up a 400-year-old book and read it. A floppy disc from ten years ago is useless to me.  Your assumption that the cloud will somehow always be there to provide continuity of knowledge strikes me as naïve.  Technological failures on a grand scale do not seem all that improbable, given the history of the world and of mankind. Too, if we are left to rely on others to keep the knowledge intact for us, then they have control over what is kept and what is erased and to what we have access.  I say, long live the book.

An issue not raised in the discussion is disintermediation (one of my favorite words).  With printed books, there is the publisher (at least) between the author and his or her potential readers (unless you want to self-publish, at great cost and with no obvious form of distribution).  Amazon and friends will publish just about any damn thing, as long as it’s not pornography and it’s formatted properly.  That’s got to be a good thing.